Sabtu, 25 Juni 2011

daisy lowe matt smith

images Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith daisy lowe matt smith. Daisy Lowe plans to buy a
  • Daisy Lowe plans to buy a



  • topman123
    06-21 02:33 AM
    Not sure why this is getting rejected...





    wallpaper Daisy Lowe plans to buy a daisy lowe matt smith. Loved up: Daisy Lowe and Matt
  • Loved up: Daisy Lowe and Matt



  • SlowRoasted
    06-08 07:17 PM
    I voted for those 3 vector ones and mine and a few more lol.

    tsk tsk, voting for yourself :bad:





    daisy lowe matt smith. This way, Daisy! Smith gives
  • This way, Daisy! Smith gives



  • rp0lol
    11-09 12:48 PM
    I completed the form, all others, please do so.





    2011 Loved up: Daisy Lowe and Matt daisy lowe matt smith. Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith
  • Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith



  • logiclife
    04-13 11:23 AM
    We have to first have confidence on our own strengths. We are a 10.5K strong group and well poised to become the largest grassroots advocacy organization of high skilled immigrants.

    Key lawmaker offices now know us. We have appeared in top media. We have the best Lobbyists in the country working for us.

    No other organization can claim such success in 1 year since inception. All we need is support of $20/month from members in order to continue this effort and grow it.

    There are people in Washington DC who influence congress as their profession. They are called "Lobbyists". Like the ones we have hired, with Patton-Boggs.

    And then there is an organization like Immigration Voice that is raising funds to pay for lobbying.

    What value can an Indian American organization add that Immigration Voice and professional lobbying cannot add?

    Indian American Organizations have been educated many many times about this problem by Immigration Voice. We have told them that if you represent the 2.3 million Indian American Community, then you should be working on this issue, because this issue affects 1 out of every 5 Indian Americans of that 2.3 million.

    Well, they have shown very lukewarm response.

    And frankly, they have other agendas and we shouldnt honestly expect them to do our bidding.

    We call ourselves highly skilled, implying that we are reasonably wellpaid. Also, we are 500,000 strong. And we have an organization to raise money and pay for lobbying. So why CANT WE HELP OURSELVES?



    more...


    daisy lowe matt smith. Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe?
  • Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe?



  • silveroaks
    10-03 10:37 AM
    They do the same n FL and whats worse....they only issue temporary license that expires every year.





    daisy lowe matt smith. Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith,
  • Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith,



  • evildead
    04-24 04:18 PM
    Anyone from Chicago near downtown? Not Napreville or Aurora. We are moving from (bay area) Santa Clara to Chicago. Office is in Downtown. Looking for a place closest to download. We are a family with small (1.5 year old) kid.

    Please suggest.


    we live in Chicagoland. PM me if you would like to talk.



    more...


    daisy lowe matt smith. Daisy Lowe and Jamie Winstone
  • Daisy Lowe and Jamie Winstone



  • GCBy3000
    07-14 01:57 PM
    I can understand before 2006 and early 2007. What is the lame duck period in between.





    2010 This way, Daisy! Smith gives daisy lowe matt smith. Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith
  • Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith



  • meridiani.planum
    02-01 05:23 AM
    thanks for the reply..this means having a dependent visa is the key at the time of approval..

    if the application was approved and the wife was on h4 (but didnot file her i485 yet..) then she could still file for her i485?

    yes. if your wife was on H4, as soon as your 485 is approved, her H4 ends. However since your 485 is getting approved, your PD is presumably current meaning she is eligible to immediately file 485, and get to that as a legal status. If she has a dependent visa approved, and has travelled here thats nice, otherwise she has to file a 485 from your home country as a follow-to-join and htat can take some time for her to travel here.

    There is no 6 month grace period as such. Its just that upto 6 months of out-of-status is forgiven at 485 approval, and since on your 485 approval your H1 ends and so does her h4, it makes her status-less here. Being in that state upto 6 months is forgiven for 485.

    Its most important that you get married before the approval of your 485. Do court-marriage if your PD is current, to be on the safe side, even if the actual ceremony is still a month or two away. When to honeymoon is upto you. Cant let USCIS decide EVERYTHING, can we...



    more...


    daisy lowe matt smith. Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe in
  • Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe in



  • mailmy_gc
    10-15 03:15 PM
    Verify your G-325 application form properly especially the employment history you provided. My wife also got the similar RFE early this year due to technical error that we made in G325 form. (My wife applied for H1 but she did not worked through that company mean while she got her EAD then started working for another company, Which voided H1-B, In G-325 we mentioned that she was working from July 2007 but her H1 is valid from October so Officer might have thought that she worked illegally for 3 months) .

    We provided w2's, pay stubs and amended G325 etc to prove that she did not worked on her H1 or illegally.

    Hope this helps you.





    hair Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith daisy lowe matt smith. Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe in
  • Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe in



  • Hermione
    10-02 11:50 AM
    Is there a real need to maintain a backup? Meaning if I need to maintain my H1 why should I apply for EAD for myself?

    The only real reason why your lawyer wanted you to apply for EAD is to collect their fees. If you are maintaining H1, there is no need to EAD. If you lose your job, you will most likely have time to get an EAD, or you may even end up doing an H1 transfer.



    more...


    daisy lowe matt smith. Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe in
  • Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe in



  • looneytunezez
    04-08 04:17 PM
    Employment-based: At this time the amount of demand being received in the Employment First preference is extremely low compared with that of recent years. Absent an immediate and dramatic increase in demand, this category will remain “Current” for all countries. It also appears unlikely that a Second preference cut-off date will be imposed for any countries other than China and India, where demand is extremely high. Based on current indications of demand, the best case scenarios for cut-off date movement each month during the coming months are as follows:

    Employment Second: Demand by applicants who are “upgrading” their status from Employment Third to Employment Second preference is very high, but the exact amount is not known. Such “upgrades” are in addition to the known demand already reported, and make it very difficult to predict ultimate demand based on forward movement of the China and India cut-off dates. While thousands of “otherwise unused” numbers will be available for potential use without regard to the China and India Employment Second preference per-country annual limits, it is not known how the “upgrades” will ultimately impact the cut-offs for those two countries. (The allocation of “otherwise unused” numbers is discussed below.)

    China: none to three weeks expected through July. No August or September estimate is possible at this time.

    India: One or more weeks, possibly followed by additional movement if demand remains stable. No August or September estimate is possible at this time.

    Employment Third:

    Worldwide: three to six weeks
    China: one to three weeks
    India: none to two weeks
    Mexico: although continued forward movement is expected, no specific projections are possible at this time.
    Philippines: three to six weeks

    Please be advised that the above ranges are estimates based upon the current demand patterns, and are subject to fluctuations during the coming months. The cut-off dates for upcoming months cannot be guaranteed, and no assumptions should be made until the formal dates are announced.

    Allocation of “otherwise unused” numbers in accordance with Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 202(a)(5)

    INA Section 202(a)(5) provides that if total demand in a calendar quarter will be insufficient to use all available numbers in an Employment preference, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limits. Based on current levels of demand, there will be otherwise unused numbers in the Employment First and Second preferences. Such numbers may be allocated without regard to per-country limits, once a country has reached its preference annual limit. Since under INA Section 203(e) such numbers must be provided strictly in priority date order regardless of chargeability, greater number use by one country would indicate greater demand by applicants from that country with earlier priority dates. Based on amount and priority dates of pending demand and year-to-date number use, a different cut-off date could be applied to each oversubscribed country, for the purpose of assuring that the maximum amount of available numbers will be used. Note that a cut-off date imposed to control the use of “otherwise unused” numbers could be earlier than the cut-off date established to control number use under a quarterly or per-country annual limit. For example, at present the India Employment Second preference cut-off date governs the use of numbers under Section 202(a)(5), India having reached its Employment Second annual limit; the China Employment Second preference cut-off date governs number use under the quarterly limit, since China has not yet reached its Employment Second annual limit.

    The rate of number use under Section 202(a)(5) is continually monitored to determine whether subsequent adjustments are needed in visa availability for the oversubscribed countries. This helps assure that all available Employment preference numbers will be used, while insuring that numbers also remain available for applicants from all other countries that have not yet reached their per-country limit.
    As mentioned earlier, the number of applicants who may be “upgrading” their status from Employment Third to Employment Second preference is unknown. As a result, the cut-off date which governs use of Section 202(a)(5) numbers has been advanced more rapidly than normal, in an attempt to ascertain the amount of “upgrade” demand in the pipeline while at the same time administering use of the available numbers. This action risks a surge in demand that could adversely impact the cut-off date later in the fiscal year. However, it also limits the possibility that potential demand would not materialize and the annual limit would not be reached due to lack of cut-off date movement.





    hot Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe? daisy lowe matt smith. mother Pearl. Proud: Matt
  • mother Pearl. Proud: Matt



  • sanju
    11-20 11:09 AM
    Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano is going to be DHS Secretary in the Obama Administration. This is a major news for us and it does has an affect on EB community as Gov. Napolitano is a strong proponent of Immigration reform and it is now believed that she has been brought to this position to spearhead the immigration reform in the Obama Administration.

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/20/transition.wrap/index.html

    This is a significant development and one is likely to affects us all.






    .



    more...


    house Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith daisy lowe matt smith. Gissa kiss! Matt Smith plants
  • Gissa kiss! Matt Smith plants



  • xmmx10
    11-19 12:16 PM
    Damn...I saw it was Apr 2007 for NSC and when I rechecked its back to Oct bulletin. What the hey...

    For Nebraska:
    https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC

    For Texas:
    https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=TSC

    Summary for I485:
    Nebraska has processed most applications that it has had for 7 months (filed on or before April 14 2007).
    Texas has processed most applications that it has had for 6 months.

    Since 6 months is the target, Texas can be considered to be caught up, and Nebraska will likely have caught up next month.

    For I485 that makes the visa bulletin the main issue.





    tattoo Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith, daisy lowe matt smith. Daisy Lowe
  • Daisy Lowe



  • akhilmahajan
    11-15 10:54 AM
    We (3 of us from the PA state chapter) had a meeting with Congressman Joe Sastak's office staff in Media, PA.

    The staff member was completely unaware of our issues (other than, FBI name check takes long time and USCIS processing is slow). However, she was eager to understand our problems.

    She recommended that we should meet the office staff in DC since they handle issues related to legislations.

    Thats great u met the congressman, I am telling you, politicians are not aware of our problems. For them legal immigration is working great and it does not needs to be bothered.

    We need to keep on meeting the politicians and highlighting our problems over and over again.

    Meetign them once is not a solution, we need to keep on following with them. This issue has to be highlighted again and again.

    Lets get together and try to highlight or issues and hardships being faced by us.

    GO IV GO. TOGETHER WE CAN.



    more...


    pictures Daisy Lowe and Jamie Winstone daisy lowe matt smith. Daisy amp; Matt Smith at
  • Daisy amp; Matt Smith at



  • sprash
    10-15 04:00 PM
    I saw the suggestion of asking lawyer to send AP while you travel to India without it. Although it sounds like a good idea but could be dangerous. I had a situation last year when I travelled to India with AP applied for but not approved. Unfortunately i had my old passport and visa damaged in India. When my lawyer wanted to expedite AP so that i can travel back as my old Visa was damaged and the only way to travel back was to use AP, they found out USCIS has issued an RFE on AP. Though RFP was trivial and they only wanted a clear copy of first page of passport and AP was approved immediately when it was submitted.


    I agree. This is very risky. I had applied for AP way back in June '08 and while my wife got her AP in AUG, mine was happily ignored till used DHS 7001 to escalate my case. I ultimately received an RFE saying that I did not include photos (which I know 100% sure I did ... they probably lost them). 3 Soft LUDs since they've received my photos, but no approval yet. I might be canceling my trip to India that commences on thanksgiving weekend if it does not come in time.





    dresses mother Pearl. Proud: Matt daisy lowe matt smith. Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith
  • Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith



  • mrane1
    08-08 03:54 PM
    Sept 07! Did you enquire with them as you should now be eligible to ask them since its already sixty days have past since you got your GC!
    Looks strange.

    Opened SR's, infopass etc... first the reason was NC... now they just say it should be approved, no idea why its stuck... Now we are just tired... let it come whenever it has to... 11 years and still waiting :mad:



    more...


    makeup Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe in daisy lowe matt smith. Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith
  • Daisy Lowe and Matt Smith



  • hopefulgc
    05-12 05:51 PM
    Absolutely

    the only requirement is if we can strictly follow what has been mentioned in the post.

    Its like this .. would we be ready to drop $1000 or $2000 to get GC years earlier?

    i think the answer in my case is yes.





    girlfriend Daisy Lowe daisy lowe matt smith. Close: Daisy Lowe (left) says
  • Close: Daisy Lowe (left) says



  • eager_immi
    07-18 11:11 AM
    Can you IM a core and ask them to put a link on main page...

    we lost a golden oportunity to do a fund drive. Historically during good news period a lot of members participated in the fund drive, but because the IV website is broken and the threads are displayed irratically and not in the latest order the funding drive threads are hidden and irrelevant one post threads are showing up. We might have lost out on a 10 to 20k worth of funding because of this mistake. I request the core team to please fix this immediately. A lot of new members have joined IV and they might not particiapate in the funding drive because of this thread mistake.





    hairstyles Matt Smith and Daisy Lowe in daisy lowe matt smith. Let me lighten your load: Matt
  • Let me lighten your load: Matt



  • Madhuri
    07-11 11:02 PM
    If this is true it's really horrible and scary that this gov. agency is handling our applications.

    This is beginning to look more and more like a organized and deliberate attempt to block people from filing for AOS.If the mysterious "knowledgeable official" quoted on the website can be summoned in court- that would be game over for the USCIS right there......


    http://www.usimmlaw.com/current_information.htm


    Copying the contents of the website below :


    Visa numbers WERE available July 2nd!!
    We have confirmed with a knowledgeable official in the Department of State Visa Office that USCIS was requesting visa numbers on Sunday July 1st, and Monday morning July 2nd - and that visa numbers were still being issued as late as the morning of July 2nd!

    In fact, close to 30,000 visa numbers were requested and issued in July - through the morning of July 2nd. And we believe that many - if not most - of the requests made in the first two days of July were for applicants whose priority dates were not current in June!

    So how can USCIS refuse to accept I-485 filings received BEFORE the State Department issued its notice that all visa numbers had been used???? We have not yet confirmed the return of any I-485s filed in July. But we do know that applications were reaching the USCIS before the State Department announcement - and while the USCIS was frantically working to use up the entire year's allocation.

    USCIS did not use all visa numbers before July 2nd.

    Did USCIS actually use the visa numbers it requested????
    Historically, the USCIS doesn't request a visa number from the Department of State until it is ready to grant the adjustment of status application. US Consuls overseas request visa numbers the month before they intend to issue the immigrant visa. This is the reason why consuls return about ten percent of the visa numbers requested - and why USCIS does not generally return any numbers.

    In fact, in making allocations of visa numbers, the Department of State factors in an expected return rate for consuls - but not for the USCIS. And the USCIS - before this June - used about 85% of the total immigrant visa numbers available.

    However, already this month, the USCIS has been returning visa numbers. This confirms our earlier suspicion that the only way the USCIS could request 68,000 visa numbers in a matter of weeks was to request them in advance of adjudicating cases.

    We believe USCIS exhausted the visa numbers by simply requesting them - not by using them. If so, and for reasons we will post shortly, we believe that over 30,000 visa numbers requested by USCIS will go unused - and will be wasted this year!





    fuzzy logic
    06-30 09:54 PM
    Bumping - Any suggestions here.





    taru1775
    09-07 12:38 PM
    I have also sent my details but have not heard anything yet.



    Tidak ada komentar:

    Posting Komentar