samswas
05-04 02:09 PM
Seems like no approvals today also during the day. We will have to wait until tonight to see more approvals .... hopefully mine tooooooo:D
wallpaper Emma Watson in Marchesa
gc_lover
06-26 07:19 PM
USCIS has to accept applications for first few days. Then they have to go through all the application to determine the number based on the country. Then they will send the number to DOS who will decide the dates of next bulletien.
It's not like USCIS will say "Oh I got 300,000 applications today, let's close the door..." It does not work that way.
I understand that you are only trying to say what your lawyer told you. But, don't try to make it sensational topic by saying "Horrible news" and all. We are anyways stressed out from the process and on top of it this rumor comes up in every other thread. :(
It's not like USCIS will say "Oh I got 300,000 applications today, let's close the door..." It does not work that way.
I understand that you are only trying to say what your lawyer told you. But, don't try to make it sensational topic by saying "Horrible news" and all. We are anyways stressed out from the process and on top of it this rumor comes up in every other thread. :(
mach1343
11-22 03:58 PM
Hi All,
I have a question in the online passport registration form. When it comes to
sections
"Address to be printed in passport" and "Other Address",
I am filling my residential address under the section "Address to be printed in passport" but for "Other Address" what should I fill in?
Am I doing it right? Please respond.
Thanks a lot,
I have a question in the online passport registration form. When it comes to
sections
"Address to be printed in passport" and "Other Address",
I am filling my residential address under the section "Address to be printed in passport" but for "Other Address" what should I fill in?
Am I doing it right? Please respond.
Thanks a lot,
2011 Emma Watson Says Nobody Will
singhsa3
05-16 04:43 PM
Sponsors for 5882
Rep Abercrombie, Neil [HI-1] - 5/13/2008 Rep Capuano, Michael E. [MA-8] - 5/13/2008
Rep Carter, John R. [TX-31] - 5/13/2008 Rep Cuellar, Henry [TX-28] - 5/15/2008
Rep Davis, Tom [VA-11] - 4/24/2008 Rep Gilchrest, Wayne T. [MD-1] - 5/13/2008
Rep Honda, Michael M. [CA-15] - 5/13/2008 Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18] - 5/13/2008
Rep Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [WI-5] - 4/23/2008 Rep Shadegg, John B. [AZ-3] - 5/13/2008
Rep Abercrombie, Neil [HI-1] - 5/13/2008 Rep Capuano, Michael E. [MA-8] - 5/13/2008
Rep Carter, John R. [TX-31] - 5/13/2008 Rep Cuellar, Henry [TX-28] - 5/15/2008
Rep Davis, Tom [VA-11] - 4/24/2008 Rep Gilchrest, Wayne T. [MD-1] - 5/13/2008
Rep Honda, Michael M. [CA-15] - 5/13/2008 Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18] - 5/13/2008
Rep Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [WI-5] - 4/23/2008 Rep Shadegg, John B. [AZ-3] - 5/13/2008
more...
vivek_ut
05-04 12:17 AM
After 13 years in the U.S. and three applications over 9 years :)
Status: Card Production ordered from NSC
PD: EB2-India, 8-Jun-2006
Approval time: 8:45pm for my wife, 10:00pm for me
Good luck to everyone!
Status: Card Production ordered from NSC
PD: EB2-India, 8-Jun-2006
Approval time: 8:45pm for my wife, 10:00pm for me
Good luck to everyone!
mbartosik
11-04 11:50 AM
To pursue this issue as a separate issue is not inline with IV's policy.
If aids receive lots of lobbying all on separate issues there will be no progress on any issues.
There is a recent thread on I-140 delays, clearly the author thinks that's one of the most important issues.
There is a thread (this one) on age out.
There are probably threads on all sorts of separate issues, I'll suggest a few:
People still with labor pending, applications that BEC completed may still be pending advertisements etc.
People with I485 returned in error.
Consultants worried about H1B renewals.
My point was that age out can be raised in meetings that address the big picture. Once we get a seat at the table there is more chance to get all the issues addressed.
An alternative strategy is to try to find law makers in favor of niche issues, like FBI name check (already being addressed), age out, I140 delays. The trouble then is that we might get some niche issues addressed but not the big picture.
If you attend law maker meetings as an IV member talking about the big picture you then have the opportunity to raise a personal example (this can be powerful). It would help you and help IV. A huge number of us have powerful cases, some economic, some family orientated.
Basically I'm saying that the sum of the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
It appears that you wish to lobby separately, or at least not following IV's strategy. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG. I only gained some limited knowledge of which law makers and their aids may be more sympathetic to family type issues (e.g. age out), by being part of IV. Thus I do not feel free to give out this information for lobbying use that is not part of the IV work.
Logistical note:
If you need something it is best to email me. Currently I'm working maybe 6 to 12 hours a week on IV stuff and that leaves me little time to read forums.
mark at immigrationvoice org
or private message me.
If aids receive lots of lobbying all on separate issues there will be no progress on any issues.
There is a recent thread on I-140 delays, clearly the author thinks that's one of the most important issues.
There is a thread (this one) on age out.
There are probably threads on all sorts of separate issues, I'll suggest a few:
People still with labor pending, applications that BEC completed may still be pending advertisements etc.
People with I485 returned in error.
Consultants worried about H1B renewals.
My point was that age out can be raised in meetings that address the big picture. Once we get a seat at the table there is more chance to get all the issues addressed.
An alternative strategy is to try to find law makers in favor of niche issues, like FBI name check (already being addressed), age out, I140 delays. The trouble then is that we might get some niche issues addressed but not the big picture.
If you attend law maker meetings as an IV member talking about the big picture you then have the opportunity to raise a personal example (this can be powerful). It would help you and help IV. A huge number of us have powerful cases, some economic, some family orientated.
Basically I'm saying that the sum of the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
It appears that you wish to lobby separately, or at least not following IV's strategy. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG. I only gained some limited knowledge of which law makers and their aids may be more sympathetic to family type issues (e.g. age out), by being part of IV. Thus I do not feel free to give out this information for lobbying use that is not part of the IV work.
Logistical note:
If you need something it is best to email me. Currently I'm working maybe 6 to 12 hours a week on IV stuff and that leaves me little time to read forums.
mark at immigrationvoice org
or private message me.
more...
chanduv23
02-17 03:44 PM
I will attend this event.
Awesome. Please bring your friends and colleagues. Please spread the word.
Awesome. Please bring your friends and colleagues. Please spread the word.
2010 Looking at Emma Watson#39;s MTV
susie
08-20 11:36 PM
my name was not interview with my family.
my family gave interview and embassy asked for original I140 and I824 approval notices to check my eligibility.
i submitted and now after 2 weaks got the follwing reply:
In your case , the I-140 was filed on sept 10, 2001 and approved on october 08, 2003. The visa became available on october 08, 2003 . Form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa became available. <my name> was born on January 03, 1986. because he (me) is above 21 years old an immigrant visa as a derivative beneficiary of Employment third prefrence (e3) immigrant visa category cannot be inssued to <my name>. In order to qualify for a visa, he (me) would need to benifit from CSPA. Since form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa becoming available on October 08, 2003.
<my name> cannot be processed under CSPA.
SO plz help me with right advice and solution so that i can travel with my family.
my mom and bro got te visa and it will expire in 6 monts and i want to go with them, can i be able to get visa in any case before their visa expire?
i badly need help.
Hi
Seems your only option is to sue. There are acoup,le of cpsa cases that even though they did not file within one year of visa approval because the alien sought legal advise, the benefit was granted
This cspa is sooooooooooo badly written and must be amended, still waiting on my cspa court case !
The other side has agreed with 90% of my case so just have to supply the other 10% proof
my family gave interview and embassy asked for original I140 and I824 approval notices to check my eligibility.
i submitted and now after 2 weaks got the follwing reply:
In your case , the I-140 was filed on sept 10, 2001 and approved on october 08, 2003. The visa became available on october 08, 2003 . Form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa became available. <my name> was born on January 03, 1986. because he (me) is above 21 years old an immigrant visa as a derivative beneficiary of Employment third prefrence (e3) immigrant visa category cannot be inssued to <my name>. In order to qualify for a visa, he (me) would need to benifit from CSPA. Since form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa becoming available on October 08, 2003.
<my name> cannot be processed under CSPA.
SO plz help me with right advice and solution so that i can travel with my family.
my mom and bro got te visa and it will expire in 6 monts and i want to go with them, can i be able to get visa in any case before their visa expire?
i badly need help.
Hi
Seems your only option is to sue. There are acoup,le of cpsa cases that even though they did not file within one year of visa approval because the alien sought legal advise, the benefit was granted
This cspa is sooooooooooo badly written and must be amended, still waiting on my cspa court case !
The other side has agreed with 90% of my case so just have to supply the other 10% proof
more...
priderock
06-14 05:37 PM
This whole process has never been fair and I don't think it ever will be (at least in near future). Just have to suck it up and move on !!! I have seen it long enough to say this.
hair Emma Watson MTV Movie Awards
Michael chertoff
09-01 09:57 PM
Congratulations to everybody who got approval email today.. I am happy for all of these folks.. one day we all will that email...
enjoys
mc
enjoys
mc
more...
mbartosik
03-14 12:02 PM
I interfiled to EB2 but do not trust that they have applied that, service request goes unanswered. So they may be processing as EB3.
Dec 2002.
Dec 2002.
hot Emma Watson – Marchesa dress,
rb_248
02-01 09:59 PM
Admins or mods must change the title of the thread. This is going to disappoint a lot of our friends in this forum.
more...
house the 2011 MTV Movie Awards
franklin
06-14 07:59 PM
Guys,
Let's not assume that visas wasted by USCIS would have been allocated to India or China. This would not have happened as these countries can not get more visa numbers than the numerical cap of 7% of the world-wide EB quota.
I'm sorry, anyone who thinks that the Priority Dates were shifted so visas would not be wasted are deluded.
Come on - the visas were going to go to waste because there was not enough manpower at UCSIS to process the applications. In what way WHATSOEVER, has this changed because there are more applications?!
Let's not assume that visas wasted by USCIS would have been allocated to India or China. This would not have happened as these countries can not get more visa numbers than the numerical cap of 7% of the world-wide EB quota.
I'm sorry, anyone who thinks that the Priority Dates were shifted so visas would not be wasted are deluded.
Come on - the visas were going to go to waste because there was not enough manpower at UCSIS to process the applications. In what way WHATSOEVER, has this changed because there are more applications?!
tattoo Cameron Diaz, Emma Watson
tonyHK12
09-29 11:56 AM
I saw that. Looks like you are trying to pimp for a lawyer. Learn to stand on your own 2 feet first.
No I'm not, I am in no way associated with them, and I could care less. Yes I know how to stand on my feet thanks. This is not a time to divide people.
Any better sugegstions for immigration lawyer then? Or do you just keep trashing other people, without giving any genuine ideas.
"Could you update your profile before drafting your plan"
I'm EB2, with approve I-140.
No I'm not, I am in no way associated with them, and I could care less. Yes I know how to stand on my feet thanks. This is not a time to divide people.
Any better sugegstions for immigration lawyer then? Or do you just keep trashing other people, without giving any genuine ideas.
"Could you update your profile before drafting your plan"
I'm EB2, with approve I-140.
more...
pictures Emma Watson: 2011 MTV Movie
rb_248
05-16 01:06 PM
I think you can file for I-485. But, once your GC gets approved you will have to move back to VA for a month or so and work from there. Remember GC is for your future job. Anyways....talk to an attorney.
dresses Gallery Index: 2011 MTV Movie
forever_waiting
01-12 06:22 PM
Yes. you are indeed having a discussion - a discussion with yourself because little of what you are saying is making any sense to anyone on this forum.
Yelling out a lie a hundred times doesnt make it the truth.
If you read IV's provisions, the one on tops is removal of per-country limits. Basically, it would remove all EB3 backlogs and WAS a part of the legislation introducted by rep lofgren in 2007/2008. for political reasons, it never passed in the house. Of course, you would blame IV for lobbying in such a way that the bills did not pass.
its very easy to criticise. Why dont you start an organization that would (in your opinion) do more for EB3? I am sure you will get the support of the thousands you claim do not believe in IV? If you succeed in doing that, there is no reason to have this "discussion".
you are a typical arm-chair critic who probably has done and will never do anything even one cents worth for the EB backlog cause.
Yes and you are showing your maturity by talking about what i write as a long essay and garbage. Why are EB2 guys scared to have a dicsussion. Is it because you donot have any talking points and are talking vaguly yourselves
BTW the reason i write so detailed is because i believe i am respecting you by replying in detail to your points. I was under the impression that we were having a discussion, but sadly i am having a disucssion and you are ranting and raving.
Yelling out a lie a hundred times doesnt make it the truth.
If you read IV's provisions, the one on tops is removal of per-country limits. Basically, it would remove all EB3 backlogs and WAS a part of the legislation introducted by rep lofgren in 2007/2008. for political reasons, it never passed in the house. Of course, you would blame IV for lobbying in such a way that the bills did not pass.
its very easy to criticise. Why dont you start an organization that would (in your opinion) do more for EB3? I am sure you will get the support of the thousands you claim do not believe in IV? If you succeed in doing that, there is no reason to have this "discussion".
you are a typical arm-chair critic who probably has done and will never do anything even one cents worth for the EB backlog cause.
Yes and you are showing your maturity by talking about what i write as a long essay and garbage. Why are EB2 guys scared to have a dicsussion. Is it because you donot have any talking points and are talking vaguly yourselves
BTW the reason i write so detailed is because i believe i am respecting you by replying in detail to your points. I was under the impression that we were having a discussion, but sadly i am having a disucssion and you are ranting and raving.
more...
makeup Gallery Index: 2011 MTV Movie
sledge_hammer
04-10 05:50 PM
You don't contribute because your issue of "name check" is not on IV's agenda?
No. The I-129 is submitted by your employer. Your leaving the country does not affect the H1 petition.
Only the COS will not be automatic in October, and you will need to get stamping or re-submit I-539 to validate your H1.
Hope you win the lottery!
No. The I-129 is submitted by your employer. Your leaving the country does not affect the H1 petition.
Only the COS will not be automatic in October, and you will need to get stamping or re-submit I-539 to validate your H1.
Hope you win the lottery!
girlfriend Emma Watson – 2011 MTV Movie
ankitaa
07-20 12:04 AM
The whole GC system is not fair ...
1) Country quota -- People from smaller countries get it very quickly while ohter keep waiting forever ....
2) Assume I applied in 2006 NOV ...lets say my friend applied in 2005 NOV ..his/her spouse comes to US in 2009 after getting married and he/she gets GC first before me ...
3) People struck in back logs ...most unfortunate guys of all
4) People struck in FBI name checks while others who appled after them keep on getting GCs ...
List goes on ............Hope some day it will become strict FIFO across all countires and it will become predictable ...
1) Country quota -- People from smaller countries get it very quickly while ohter keep waiting forever ....
2) Assume I applied in 2006 NOV ...lets say my friend applied in 2005 NOV ..his/her spouse comes to US in 2009 after getting married and he/she gets GC first before me ...
3) People struck in back logs ...most unfortunate guys of all
4) People struck in FBI name checks while others who appled after them keep on getting GCs ...
List goes on ............Hope some day it will become strict FIFO across all countires and it will become predictable ...
hairstyles Emma Watson – 2011 MTV Movie
yvjoshi100
02-21 06:06 PM
I have been continuously requesting in my previous postings that CORE Team should take up the issue of sufferings of children who have turned 21 and who could not file 485 applications due to visa retrogression. I do appreciate that this may not impact a large number of our members and CORE is committing its recourses for a much wider issue of over all visa number increase. However, getting visa number increased is a big effort and in current environment may not be achieved. However, getting CSPA amended may not e that much a big deal and if CORE team starts working on it, we may see positive result. As such, I again request CORE team members to take up this issue. I am prepared to lend my support in whatever way I can and I am sure there would be many other members who will be willing to do the same.
saileshdude
04-08 06:23 PM
If you think any fraud is going on or there is a law being misused you must complain to USCIS and Ombudsman. Unless it is reported nobody in a position of power will know about it and nothing will be done to stop it.
And this should be done sooner than later. If we keep quiet about this like everyone did for labor substitution, we are the only ones who are going to suffer. I came here in 1998 and did my MS and have been working like dog all these years. Have faced layoffs, exploiting by DCC, had to refile my GC and now these fake EB1 guys come along and get GC in 6 months.
Trust me, I will be reporting the company that I have heard of the case to ombudsman and USCIS. And I think everyone who has heard of this should verify and then report it also.
Lets start this campaign also because in the long run, it will benefit both EB2 and EB3.
And genuine EB1 guys dont have to worry about this because if they really do have extra-ordinary capabilities they should not have hard time proving it (so called Multinational executives)
And this should be done sooner than later. If we keep quiet about this like everyone did for labor substitution, we are the only ones who are going to suffer. I came here in 1998 and did my MS and have been working like dog all these years. Have faced layoffs, exploiting by DCC, had to refile my GC and now these fake EB1 guys come along and get GC in 6 months.
Trust me, I will be reporting the company that I have heard of the case to ombudsman and USCIS. And I think everyone who has heard of this should verify and then report it also.
Lets start this campaign also because in the long run, it will benefit both EB2 and EB3.
And genuine EB1 guys dont have to worry about this because if they really do have extra-ordinary capabilities they should not have hard time proving it (so called Multinational executives)
shantak
08-14 05:49 PM
I had an infopass appointment today and that was big waste of time and i had to drive 4 hours(2 hrs each way) for this.
They did not offer me any more information than the regular customer service.
She told me that they have received my FP on 7/22 (although I have given mine on 6/19) and it is not unusual that my application is pending. She asked me wait for another 30 days and come back if I dont receive until then.
I asked her if she could send an email or open an SR to the service center, and she said no saying that she will do that only after 30 days have passed beyond 90 day period.
I asked her about the interim EAD and she did not understand what I was talking about. When I provided her about USCIS memo, she said "yeah that is what im saying, we will contact the service center for that 30days after the stipualated 90 days have passed". Basically she did not know what she was talking about.
Im planning to contact the senator next week (this time I want to make sure that 90days have passed before I approach them)
Interestingly she told me that many people are coming to her everyday regarding the same (EAD renewal) and that Service Centers are aware of this (although this does not make any difference to us).
When I asked her if the case was assigned to an "officer", she told me that EADs are not assigned to officers (unlike 485) they are just reviewed and approved.
Hopefully they will approve our eads soon so that I can atleast drive a car.
Details:
EAD eFiled May 23rd
FP on June 19th
LUD:7/22
They did not offer me any more information than the regular customer service.
She told me that they have received my FP on 7/22 (although I have given mine on 6/19) and it is not unusual that my application is pending. She asked me wait for another 30 days and come back if I dont receive until then.
I asked her if she could send an email or open an SR to the service center, and she said no saying that she will do that only after 30 days have passed beyond 90 day period.
I asked her about the interim EAD and she did not understand what I was talking about. When I provided her about USCIS memo, she said "yeah that is what im saying, we will contact the service center for that 30days after the stipualated 90 days have passed". Basically she did not know what she was talking about.
Im planning to contact the senator next week (this time I want to make sure that 90days have passed before I approach them)
Interestingly she told me that many people are coming to her everyday regarding the same (EAD renewal) and that Service Centers are aware of this (although this does not make any difference to us).
When I asked her if the case was assigned to an "officer", she told me that EADs are not assigned to officers (unlike 485) they are just reviewed and approved.
Hopefully they will approve our eads soon so that I can atleast drive a car.
Details:
EAD eFiled May 23rd
FP on June 19th
LUD:7/22
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar