rkotamurthy
08-14 01:32 PM
/\/\/\/\ Bump
wallpaper Selena Gomez and Justin Bieber
amitga
01-15 09:18 PM
Atleast they should allow that.
jain4444
07-20 01:24 PM
Thanks guys for your answer
2011 makeup selena gomez and justin
EndlessWait
01-03 05:25 PM
On Sept. 14, President Bush signed the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007, an ethics and lobbying reform bill, which enforces a number of new restrictions.
Under the new law, lobbyists are prohibited from providing gifts, food, beverage and travel to Members of Congress, their staff or employees. A violation of this law could result in civil fines and/or criminal prosecution for the Company and individuals involved.
?????
:D
Under the new law, lobbyists are prohibited from providing gifts, food, beverage and travel to Members of Congress, their staff or employees. A violation of this law could result in civil fines and/or criminal prosecution for the Company and individuals involved.
?????
:D
more...
shishya
04-30 11:18 AM
Hi,
I am lost trying to find information on this.
Here's the situation for adding my wife to my I-485 application (we are from India). We DO have her 100% correct birth certificate we got issued last month.
However, since the issue date on it is April 2011, our lawyer insists that we need affidavits from her parents as well (perhaps to avoid RFEs). Further the lawyer insists that the Foreign Affairs Manual for India states that these be sworn in front of a first class magistrate of India.
When her parents went to the local court and request the first class magistrate, the court officer is demanding that we have a sealed copy of the requesting authority (USCIS) that clearly states that a first class magistrate's signature is required!
Questions:
(i) Is the affidavit supposed to be sworn in front of first class magistrate? Even if we have a corrected birth certificate?? Or can it be signed by an 'Executive Magistrate' or maybe even just notarized??
(ii) If yes, did someone else face a similar issue?
(iii) If yes, is there a USCIS document I could send to satisfy their demand?
I did try to find a USCIS document but all it states is that ... IF the birth certificate is unavailable ... then "sworn affidavits" need to accompany non-availability certificate from a competent local government authority.
Please advise :(
PS: FYI, they went to the Palghar court in Maharashtra, India.
I am lost trying to find information on this.
Here's the situation for adding my wife to my I-485 application (we are from India). We DO have her 100% correct birth certificate we got issued last month.
However, since the issue date on it is April 2011, our lawyer insists that we need affidavits from her parents as well (perhaps to avoid RFEs). Further the lawyer insists that the Foreign Affairs Manual for India states that these be sworn in front of a first class magistrate of India.
When her parents went to the local court and request the first class magistrate, the court officer is demanding that we have a sealed copy of the requesting authority (USCIS) that clearly states that a first class magistrate's signature is required!
Questions:
(i) Is the affidavit supposed to be sworn in front of first class magistrate? Even if we have a corrected birth certificate?? Or can it be signed by an 'Executive Magistrate' or maybe even just notarized??
(ii) If yes, did someone else face a similar issue?
(iii) If yes, is there a USCIS document I could send to satisfy their demand?
I did try to find a USCIS document but all it states is that ... IF the birth certificate is unavailable ... then "sworn affidavits" need to accompany non-availability certificate from a competent local government authority.
Please advise :(
PS: FYI, they went to the Palghar court in Maharashtra, India.
%25252525252525252525252BMade%25252525252525252525252Bby%25252525252525252525252BMatt.png "selena gomez and justin bieber")
Overstay
05-16 08:11 AM
USCIS - Change of Address Information (http://www.uscis.gov/addresschange)
Penalties for Failure to Comply
A willful failure to give written notice to the USCIS of a change of address within 10 days of moving to the new address is a misdemeanor crime. If convicted, you (or parent or legal guardian of an alien under age 14 who is required to give notice) can be fined up to $200 or imprisoned up to 30 days, or both. The alien may also be subject to removal from the United States. (INA � 266(b)). Compliance with the requirement to notify the USCIS of any address changes is also a condition of your stay in the United States. Failure to comply could also jeopardize your ability to obtain a future visa or other immigration benefit.
Penalties for Failure to Comply
A willful failure to give written notice to the USCIS of a change of address within 10 days of moving to the new address is a misdemeanor crime. If convicted, you (or parent or legal guardian of an alien under age 14 who is required to give notice) can be fined up to $200 or imprisoned up to 30 days, or both. The alien may also be subject to removal from the United States. (INA � 266(b)). Compliance with the requirement to notify the USCIS of any address changes is also a condition of your stay in the United States. Failure to comply could also jeopardize your ability to obtain a future visa or other immigration benefit.
more...
nnk555
05-04 11:10 PM
Thanks for reply.
2010 selena gomez and justin bieber
ivuser9
03-30 08:01 PM
Thank you for sharing. Any ideas about visitor visas? how they are giving?
Cheers
Cheers
more...
VMH_GC
07-05 08:52 PM
I agree that i should put this message in the media drive thread. But unfortunately i don't know/have permission to delete this thread, can someone close this thread?
hair selena gomez and demi lovato
idark
06-29 02:19 PM
Nice concept :) Very innovative!
more...
prem_goel
04-17 02:02 PM
I changed jobs twice after I-140 approval/180 - days of filing 485. I am in the 6th year of my H-1B. Both the times I transfered my H-1B and got validity for 3 years based on AC-21.
Now I know there is no formal form for AC-21. Most of the people send a letter along with some supporting documentation that their new job is similar to the old one. I didn't send any such letter, however when my H-1B transfers were done, the attorneys quoted AC-21 in the petition and got 3 year H-1B extensions.
My question is, would that consider notifying USCIS of AC-21, or is the 485 department different from H-1B department?
Now I know there is no formal form for AC-21. Most of the people send a letter along with some supporting documentation that their new job is similar to the old one. I didn't send any such letter, however when my H-1B transfers were done, the attorneys quoted AC-21 in the petition and got 3 year H-1B extensions.
My question is, would that consider notifying USCIS of AC-21, or is the 485 department different from H-1B department?
hot Justin+ieber+kissing+a+
senk1s
11-09 06:52 PM
thanks for sharing your experience
In our FP - they circled only 485 and we got an lud on 485 ...nothing changed on 765. waiting for the 90 days to schedule an infopass
In our FP - they circled only 485 and we got an lud on 485 ...nothing changed on 765. waiting for the 90 days to schedule an infopass
more...
house justin bieber and selena gomez
freakin_gc
03-31 01:51 PM
Hello
I received the following LUDs on my I-140
Soft LUD 03/28/08
Soft LUD 03/30/08 (Yeah on Sunday)
Soft LUD 03/31/08
can anyone tell me what is going on? My I-140 filing date is 6/13/2008 EB3 Category(India), NSC
Thanks
I received the following LUDs on my I-140
Soft LUD 03/28/08
Soft LUD 03/30/08 (Yeah on Sunday)
Soft LUD 03/31/08
can anyone tell me what is going on? My I-140 filing date is 6/13/2008 EB3 Category(India), NSC
Thanks
tattoo selena gomez and justin bieber
pappu
01-09 11:29 AM
Technically yes. But USCIS looks at cases under a microscope when they see multiple applications from a same applicant. And if the the sponsor is a small firm, you can expect some careful screening. Increasingly USCIS is making efforts to ensure GC system is not abused by people. A lot of companies had in the filed for GC for several employees and GC applications for latter and sometimes former applicants were denied when it was found that the employer cannot show enough funds to support them. Take the risk only when you are sure. Lawyers will be happy to file multiple applications because they will get double their fees. BTW each lawyer generally makes you sign a contract beofre taking a case where the lawyer says that he cannot guarantee GC and if it is denied, lawyer takes no responsibility.
more...
pictures justin bieber and selena gomez
amitdce
08-07 02:24 PM
Hi,
My EAD card was sent to my old address, which I failed to update in time. I have been following up with USCIS for more than a month, but haven't been able to receive the card or the approval notice so far. I have to start working on Monday (Aug 11th), so this is really urgent!!
I can join and submit the EAD card within 90 days (as per the I-9), but my employer needs to see the approval letter (something which proves to them that my EAD case has been approved).
I do have the following which indicate my approved status:
1. My online status used to show that the case was approved (it said that the card was mailed to me). Now it has changed and says that a new letter (not the EAD card) has been mailed, but I won't get this letter till after Aug. 11th, my joining date. I do have a printout of the previous status, though.
2. I managed to get a letter from my university saying that my case has been approved.
3. I have the receipt notice, which shows that the case was submitted and received by USCIS.
My company still insisted that they would need a letter from USCIS saying that my case has been approved. Any advice on what I can do from here??
many thanks!!
-Amit
My EAD card was sent to my old address, which I failed to update in time. I have been following up with USCIS for more than a month, but haven't been able to receive the card or the approval notice so far. I have to start working on Monday (Aug 11th), so this is really urgent!!
I can join and submit the EAD card within 90 days (as per the I-9), but my employer needs to see the approval letter (something which proves to them that my EAD case has been approved).
I do have the following which indicate my approved status:
1. My online status used to show that the case was approved (it said that the card was mailed to me). Now it has changed and says that a new letter (not the EAD card) has been mailed, but I won't get this letter till after Aug. 11th, my joining date. I do have a printout of the previous status, though.
2. I managed to get a letter from my university saying that my case has been approved.
3. I have the receipt notice, which shows that the case was submitted and received by USCIS.
My company still insisted that they would need a letter from USCIS saying that my case has been approved. Any advice on what I can do from here??
many thanks!!
-Amit
dresses Justin Bieber, 16, and Selena
kumarblr76
11-06 12:15 AM
More clarifications are required about this new rule, this is a duplicate filing requirement in addition to FBAR
more...
makeup selena gomez and justin bieber
sbmallik
05-29 09:16 PM
Yes your employer can apply L1 visa for you again.
girlfriend gomez and justin bieber
Blog Feeds
02-08 06:10 PM
Immigration Visa Attorney Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/flag_CNMI.gifAll immigration law attorneys must deal with foreign countries, unique international legal issues, and some quaint interpretations of law. The lawyers at Los Angeles' Fong & Chun are no exception, and in fact, this recent change affects some of our clients who do business in or own businesses in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
On 28 November 2008, "the United States" as defined for purposes of the Immigration & Nationality Act (INA) just got bigger, with the addition of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Although there are probably wrinkles I have not yet read in the treaty, this essentially puts the CNMI on the same footing as Puerto Rico. Here's the cute part:
Because the CNMI will become part of the "United States" as defined by �101(a)(38) of the INA, "residence or presence in the CNMI before 28 November 2009 shall NOT be considered residence or physical presence within the USA for INA purposes. Thus, on 29 November 2009, all persons physically present in the CNMI are considered "to be present in the United States without inspection, by operation of law."
Will these PWIs (present without inspection) be eligible to adjust status? Unclear? Are they working "abroad" for purposes of L visas? Yes, as it turns out. One thing is clear: Legal Permanent Residents (so-called "green" card holders) who wish to base a naturalization application based on physical presence in the CNMI will NOT be able to do so for pre-29 November 2009 periods of time. Isn't this esoterica fun? --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/02/the-usa-is-bigger.html)
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/flag_CNMI.gifAll immigration law attorneys must deal with foreign countries, unique international legal issues, and some quaint interpretations of law. The lawyers at Los Angeles' Fong & Chun are no exception, and in fact, this recent change affects some of our clients who do business in or own businesses in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
On 28 November 2008, "the United States" as defined for purposes of the Immigration & Nationality Act (INA) just got bigger, with the addition of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Although there are probably wrinkles I have not yet read in the treaty, this essentially puts the CNMI on the same footing as Puerto Rico. Here's the cute part:
Because the CNMI will become part of the "United States" as defined by �101(a)(38) of the INA, "residence or presence in the CNMI before 28 November 2009 shall NOT be considered residence or physical presence within the USA for INA purposes. Thus, on 29 November 2009, all persons physically present in the CNMI are considered "to be present in the United States without inspection, by operation of law."
Will these PWIs (present without inspection) be eligible to adjust status? Unclear? Are they working "abroad" for purposes of L visas? Yes, as it turns out. One thing is clear: Legal Permanent Residents (so-called "green" card holders) who wish to base a naturalization application based on physical presence in the CNMI will NOT be able to do so for pre-29 November 2009 periods of time. Isn't this esoterica fun? --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/02/the-usa-is-bigger.html)
hairstyles Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
jettu77
10-01 03:54 PM
^^^
iwantgc
10-10 11:21 AM
Does anyone know when is the November 2006 visa bulletin gonna be out?
bp333
05-24 09:43 PM
In my case I applied for my MIL visa extension on March 15th. We received the approval last week. Her I-94 expired on May 15th, we chose to wait till we heard the decision.
I only requested for 4 months. Also, this is the second extension I applied for my MIL and this is her 4th visit to US. My take, you should be good as long as you state a valid reason and show good financial support..
I only requested for 4 months. Also, this is the second extension I applied for my MIL and this is her 4th visit to US. My take, you should be good as long as you state a valid reason and show good financial support..
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar