greatzolin
08-28 03:42 PM
oe of them is a July 23rd filer...!!
So he is on a different status.!
So he is on a different status.!
wallpaper The Voice airs at 9PM tonight
Blog Feeds
03-24 09:40 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
The Center for American Progress released a report detailing the actual cost of the only solution proposed by anti-immigration restrictionists--Mass Deportation. In "The Costs of Mass Deportation (http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/03/deportation_cost.html),"Marshal Fitz, Gebe Martinez and Madura Wijewardena have put together a realistic appraisal of the costs of the only option other than comprehensive immigration reform. It is not a pretty picture. With costs over 5 years of $285 BILLION dollars (money which most folks understand that we do not have), we are faced with what appears to be an easy choice.
One, bring 12 million people out of the shadow economy and into the light. Allow them to pay taxes. Allow them to drive without fear. Allow them to live with their families. Allow them to generate wealth in the greatest economic engine ever created by man, the U.S. economy. Change our legal immigration system to eliminate outrageous non-immigrant and immigrant visa delays and encourage the immigration to the U.S. of the best and the brightest.
Or, two, deport everyone who had the courage to try to make it in America, even without a visa or status. Keep legal immigration restricted and strangle the economy, innovation, and motivation. Create fear and panic in immigrant communities, both legal and undocumented. Unmotivate immigrant youth to excel in school. Do everything in your power to cause distrust of lawful enforcement authority in immigrant communities.
These are your choices Congress. These are your choices Mr. President. Which will you have the courage to pursue and change?
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5480778243706963683?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/03/deporting-them-all-costly-ineffective.html)
The Center for American Progress released a report detailing the actual cost of the only solution proposed by anti-immigration restrictionists--Mass Deportation. In "The Costs of Mass Deportation (http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/03/deportation_cost.html),"Marshal Fitz, Gebe Martinez and Madura Wijewardena have put together a realistic appraisal of the costs of the only option other than comprehensive immigration reform. It is not a pretty picture. With costs over 5 years of $285 BILLION dollars (money which most folks understand that we do not have), we are faced with what appears to be an easy choice.
One, bring 12 million people out of the shadow economy and into the light. Allow them to pay taxes. Allow them to drive without fear. Allow them to live with their families. Allow them to generate wealth in the greatest economic engine ever created by man, the U.S. economy. Change our legal immigration system to eliminate outrageous non-immigrant and immigrant visa delays and encourage the immigration to the U.S. of the best and the brightest.
Or, two, deport everyone who had the courage to try to make it in America, even without a visa or status. Keep legal immigration restricted and strangle the economy, innovation, and motivation. Create fear and panic in immigrant communities, both legal and undocumented. Unmotivate immigrant youth to excel in school. Do everything in your power to cause distrust of lawful enforcement authority in immigrant communities.
These are your choices Congress. These are your choices Mr. President. Which will you have the courage to pursue and change?
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5480778243706963683?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/03/deporting-them-all-costly-ineffective.html)
arnet
10-22 03:51 PM
i'm not recommending any site, but someone mentioned the following site before (check/use it at your own risk) :):
http://www.gtrr.net/
http://www.gtrr.net/
2011 The Voice
backtoschool
01-05 04:21 PM
All,
I had posted some queries previously and thanks to all who took time to respond.
As I had said before , I have an admission to study for my MBA outside US for one year. Here is the latest update:
I was thinking I will get a one year leave abscence from my employer ( advt on the website), but apparently they dont support studies as part of the deal.
So i am out of luck;
Considering my situation what do you gurus recommend.
How can I leave US yet maintain my GC process.
My I-140 is approved
Situation:
Spouse in school Full time Studies on I-485 pending. ( entered on F1 then converted to I485..... so going back to F1 is impossible)..
I want her status to be preserved.
My thought:
Resign from my company when I need to leave. Convince them that I will return. Maintain no ties with the company for one year..basically can be compared to being jobless for one year.
and then get a letter that a future similar job will be available with the same Co. ( that sponsored my GC)...
Is this feasible ./practical?
I had posted some queries previously and thanks to all who took time to respond.
As I had said before , I have an admission to study for my MBA outside US for one year. Here is the latest update:
I was thinking I will get a one year leave abscence from my employer ( advt on the website), but apparently they dont support studies as part of the deal.
So i am out of luck;
Considering my situation what do you gurus recommend.
How can I leave US yet maintain my GC process.
My I-140 is approved
Situation:
Spouse in school Full time Studies on I-485 pending. ( entered on F1 then converted to I485..... so going back to F1 is impossible)..
I want her status to be preserved.
My thought:
Resign from my company when I need to leave. Convince them that I will return. Maintain no ties with the company for one year..basically can be compared to being jobless for one year.
and then get a letter that a future similar job will be available with the same Co. ( that sponsored my GC)...
Is this feasible ./practical?
more...
shishya
04-30 11:18 AM
Hi,
I am lost trying to find information on this.
Here's the situation for adding my wife to my I-485 application (we are from India). We DO have her 100% correct birth certificate we got issued last month.
However, since the issue date on it is April 2011, our lawyer insists that we need affidavits from her parents as well (perhaps to avoid RFEs). Further the lawyer insists that the Foreign Affairs Manual for India states that these be sworn in front of a first class magistrate of India.
When her parents went to the local court and request the first class magistrate, the court officer is demanding that we have a sealed copy of the requesting authority (USCIS) that clearly states that a first class magistrate's signature is required!
Questions:
(i) Is the affidavit supposed to be sworn in front of first class magistrate? Even if we have a corrected birth certificate?? Or can it be signed by an 'Executive Magistrate' or maybe even just notarized??
(ii) If yes, did someone else face a similar issue?
(iii) If yes, is there a USCIS document I could send to satisfy their demand?
I did try to find a USCIS document but all it states is that ... IF the birth certificate is unavailable ... then "sworn affidavits" need to accompany non-availability certificate from a competent local government authority.
Please advise :(
PS: FYI, they went to the Palghar court in Maharashtra, India.
I am lost trying to find information on this.
Here's the situation for adding my wife to my I-485 application (we are from India). We DO have her 100% correct birth certificate we got issued last month.
However, since the issue date on it is April 2011, our lawyer insists that we need affidavits from her parents as well (perhaps to avoid RFEs). Further the lawyer insists that the Foreign Affairs Manual for India states that these be sworn in front of a first class magistrate of India.
When her parents went to the local court and request the first class magistrate, the court officer is demanding that we have a sealed copy of the requesting authority (USCIS) that clearly states that a first class magistrate's signature is required!
Questions:
(i) Is the affidavit supposed to be sworn in front of first class magistrate? Even if we have a corrected birth certificate?? Or can it be signed by an 'Executive Magistrate' or maybe even just notarized??
(ii) If yes, did someone else face a similar issue?
(iii) If yes, is there a USCIS document I could send to satisfy their demand?
I did try to find a USCIS document but all it states is that ... IF the birth certificate is unavailable ... then "sworn affidavits" need to accompany non-availability certificate from a competent local government authority.
Please advise :(
PS: FYI, they went to the Palghar court in Maharashtra, India.
chintu123
12-21 05:44 PM
Hi ,
Here is my scenario
H4 visa----oct-2007 to sept-2010
Entered US---oct--2008 on h4
Filed for h1---april 2009
H1 approved---aug 2009
Actually i had to start a project dated 12-oct'09 but unfortunately the project got cancelled.From then i have been looking for project but no luck.Currently i am in a dilemma regarding my status and course of action.I am thinking to change my status to H4 again by filing i-539.
The main problem is my employer did not run any payroll for me since oct-st(official kick off date afetr h1 COS approval) i did not have any project and when i ask him about that he says he can state that i will officially join the company in Jan 2010 and he will start running the payroll from jan 2010
My questions are
1. How safe is it to apply COS at this point
2. If in case he starts running my payroll from Jan and still i dont land in a project even after couple of months can i go head and change my status to h4 in march with the 2 paystubs (jan and feb which he is promising to run)
3.in worst case if the payroll is not run by him what would be the best course of action
I would appreciate your response
Thanks
Here is my scenario
H4 visa----oct-2007 to sept-2010
Entered US---oct--2008 on h4
Filed for h1---april 2009
H1 approved---aug 2009
Actually i had to start a project dated 12-oct'09 but unfortunately the project got cancelled.From then i have been looking for project but no luck.Currently i am in a dilemma regarding my status and course of action.I am thinking to change my status to H4 again by filing i-539.
The main problem is my employer did not run any payroll for me since oct-st(official kick off date afetr h1 COS approval) i did not have any project and when i ask him about that he says he can state that i will officially join the company in Jan 2010 and he will start running the payroll from jan 2010
My questions are
1. How safe is it to apply COS at this point
2. If in case he starts running my payroll from Jan and still i dont land in a project even after couple of months can i go head and change my status to h4 in march with the 2 paystubs (jan and feb which he is promising to run)
3.in worst case if the payroll is not run by him what would be the best course of action
I would appreciate your response
Thanks
more...
Rocky4884
05-26 04:41 PM
Thanks & appreciate your prompt response...
2010 to the thread: The Voice
fall1998
05-18 09:59 AM
Hi,
For everyone, PD on I-485 is blank, it is only shown on I-140 approval notice.
Chill :-)
For everyone, PD on I-485 is blank, it is only shown on I-140 approval notice.
Chill :-)
more...
parablergh
08-31 07:58 PM
I'm not an attorney, but an immigration paralegal. You can apply for the extension within six months of expiry. As long as your passport is valid at the time of filing you should be fine.
hair the voice group photo
Bezzy
07-22 09:45 PM
For EB3 case, after receiving the approval for I 140, I know that we have to wait till DOL Proiority Date is current to be able to file for I485.
If we decide to receive the green card in any consulars overseas, can we just go ahead and file the I485 after getting the I140 approval? (without waiting for PD to be current)
Any advice would be appreciated?
If we decide to receive the green card in any consulars overseas, can we just go ahead and file the I485 after getting the I140 approval? (without waiting for PD to be current)
Any advice would be appreciated?
more...
kiran8376
09-08 10:01 AM
Hi All,
My Employer applied for Labor on Aug 11th 2010 and yesterday we got the audit notice saying :
The application indicates the foreign worker is required to live on employer's premises although the application does not indicate the position is for a Live-in domestic. Please provide a detailed explanation indicating the reason the foreign worker must reside with the employer.
In ETA-9089 for Section H-17 question we have checked "Yes" but i guess it should be No.
We miss understood the question and thought it was asking about working at location and maked it yes.
my question is :
1) Can we make correction and send while replying to Audit (RFE)?
Please help on this.
My Employer applied for Labor on Aug 11th 2010 and yesterday we got the audit notice saying :
The application indicates the foreign worker is required to live on employer's premises although the application does not indicate the position is for a Live-in domestic. Please provide a detailed explanation indicating the reason the foreign worker must reside with the employer.
In ETA-9089 for Section H-17 question we have checked "Yes" but i guess it should be No.
We miss understood the question and thought it was asking about working at location and maked it yes.
my question is :
1) Can we make correction and send while replying to Audit (RFE)?
Please help on this.
hot The Voice
arnet
10-22 03:51 PM
i'm not recommending any site, but someone mentioned the following site before (check/use it at your own risk) :):
http://www.gtrr.net/
http://www.gtrr.net/
more...
house VIDEO: The Voice Judges Go
ras
06-15 02:01 AM
If I were to go for an India visit, Do I need to have the stamping done again while returning?
tattoo The voice has a proposal
sgorla
06-21 03:27 PM
I will try installing V8. So, you had 4 pages of info about you, and another 4 pages of info about your dependent?
we used Adobe Acrobat Professional 8.
we used Adobe Acrobat Professional 8.
more...
pictures The Voice
smsthss
02-19 07:43 PM
Unless you know the outcome, you never know.
Just be candid and talk to your employer. Sometimes they don't even know this as diff ppl in HR handle and interpret cases differently. I would talk to my employer.
my employer has no clue whether it can be done or not. however i posted this same Q to my attorney. i am waiting for the response from him. If anyone else have any inputs, i would appreciate it.
Just be candid and talk to your employer. Sometimes they don't even know this as diff ppl in HR handle and interpret cases differently. I would talk to my employer.
my employer has no clue whether it can be done or not. however i posted this same Q to my attorney. i am waiting for the response from him. If anyone else have any inputs, i would appreciate it.
dresses of the Voice photo:Stephan
rc0878
09-17 02:34 PM
I am glad to know that
thanks
I think it is better. Your EAD and AP will be processed faster because they are in CSC and your I-485 is in TSC, which is better than NSC.
thanks
I think it is better. Your EAD and AP will be processed faster because they are in CSC and your I-485 is in TSC, which is better than NSC.
more...
makeup McEntire in quot;The Voicequot;
gcpool
08-07 01:20 PM
How about filing writ of mandamus
girlfriend the voice
sw33t
08-22 12:04 AM
Please join the Texas IV group for more information.
Thank you
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
Thank you
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
hairstyles The Voice 2011 auditions are
prathap
04-08 09:03 PM
My current H1 B expires on July 31 2011. With this I will be exhausting my renewals quota as my sponsoring company Wipro has not initiated GC process. Also when my last renewal was done, a mistake was done by Wipro Visa office. My first entry to US was in Aug 2004. After that I had gone out of US in Aug 2005 for 1 month vacation and returned in Sept 2005. Each time when we file for extensions, we give all the entry and exit dates. The Wipro visa office had incorrectly entered my first entry into US as Sept 2005 even though it should have been Aug 2004. Based on this they renewed my petition till July 31 2011. If we calculate now, it turns out to be the seventh year on H1. When I tried to change my employer this year, they looked at these details and informed that if I start GC process now, they will definitely calculate my dates and find out that I am in the 7th year of H1 without GC initiation. So they told it will cause issues and it would be better for me to leave the country after July 31 2011, wait for 1 year, sponsor a new H1 and then come back.
Is there any alternative I have here? Thanks for offering help.
Is there any alternative I have here? Thanks for offering help.
jliechty
June 8th, 2005, 07:32 AM
Certainly nicer than watery milk. .........nice photos!
Quoted For Truth :D
Good job on the soft water, P T :)
Quoted For Truth :D
Good job on the soft water, P T :)
kirupa
11-07 12:39 PM
I certainly can write about this, and I may do so in the future. Were you able to get your question resolved? :)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar